PJA chief accepts Bryony Frost was bullied and not ‘felt’ bullied
Statement that followed conclusion of Robbie Dunne hearing sparked much debate.
Paul Struthers, chief executive of the Professional Jockeys Association, has accepted the organisation was wrong to say Bryony Frost had “felt” bullied by fellow rider Robbie Dunne in the aftermath of Thursday’s conclusion to the high-profile British Horseracing Authority disciplinary hearing. Dunne was banned for 18 months, with three months suspended, after the independent panel found he had bullied and harassed Frost, engaging in conduct on the track, in the weighing room and online that was prejudicial to the integrity, proper conduct and good reputation of horseracing. The PJA statement issued following that verdict criticised both the British Horseracing Authority investigation and the panel, while expressing sympathy that Frost “felt” bullied – a statement Struthers acknowledged to be wrong. Speaking to Racing TV’s Luck On Sunday programme, Struthers said: “Yes, we do accept the disciplinary panel’s judgement on that and their decision that she was. These are really unique circumstances, it’s the first time we’ve had a case like this involving bullying allegations pitting one member against another.
“We have a job to support both and we had one member making very serious allegations and another maintaining their innocence of all bar one of them. “We were trying to find the words that walked that tightrope and we understand why it has caused the issues that it has and why we do want to make clear that we do accept the disciplinary panel’s finding that Bryony was bullied and the language used was deeply and grossly inappropriate. “We certainly accept we could have phrased it differently, I think there is that balance between the two polar opposite positions of the individuals involved in this case.” In October the PJA had called on the BHA to bring the case to a close, claiming a fair hearing would be “impossible” after details of the report were leaked to a newspaper. In Thursday’s statement the PJA said Dunne had been subjected to a process that was not “remotely fair”. Struthers now concedes the initial insistence the case be dropped could have been a mistake, but believes the process itself needs further scrutiny. He said: “Maybe it was an error and it would certainly have made life easier had we not made that call. I think there are things about the process, in particular in this case, but I think it is an issue we have had for some time about the process that licensed individuals face and concerns about the process.


Follow us on Twitter racing365dotcom and like our Facebook page.
Latest
-
Horse Racing
All you need to know about the Travers Stakes ahead of the 157th running of this legendary race
The 157th Travers Stakes, known as the...
-
Horse Racing
Greatest show on the Knavesmire – a look at the Ebor Festival’s Juddmonte International Stakes
The final weekend of August brings a...
-
Horse Racing
The royal return – A guide to the 167th King’s Plate at Woodbine
Mid-August brings peak excitement for North American...
-
Horse Racing
5 reasons why the weekend’s Whitney Stakes is a punters paradise
The midsummer meet at Saratoga Racecourse reaches...
-
Horse Racing
Speed, style, and strategy – a punter’s preview for the Stewards Cup
The historic Goodwood Racecourse is preparing for...
-
Horse Racing
Ascot’s King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes preview – betting tips and track insights
The midsummer highlight of the British flat...
-
Horse Racing
2026 Juddmonte Irish Oaks preview – Elite fillies chase Classic glory
The fourth Classic of the Irish flat...
-
Horse Racing
Newmarket July Festival and July Cup – the ultimate guide
The English summer is heating up, and...
-
Horse Racing
Durban July preview – Everything you need to know about Africa’s richest race
The Durban July is set to illuminate...









