PJA chief accepts Bryony Frost was bullied and not ‘felt’ bullied
Statement that followed conclusion of Robbie Dunne hearing sparked much debate.
Paul Struthers, chief executive of the Professional Jockeys Association, has accepted the organisation was wrong to say Bryony Frost had “felt” bullied by fellow rider Robbie Dunne in the aftermath of Thursday’s conclusion to the high-profile British Horseracing Authority disciplinary hearing. Dunne was banned for 18 months, with three months suspended, after the independent panel found he had bullied and harassed Frost, engaging in conduct on the track, in the weighing room and online that was prejudicial to the integrity, proper conduct and good reputation of horseracing. The PJA statement issued following that verdict criticised both the British Horseracing Authority investigation and the panel, while expressing sympathy that Frost “felt” bullied – a statement Struthers acknowledged to be wrong. Speaking to Racing TV’s Luck On Sunday programme, Struthers said: “Yes, we do accept the disciplinary panel’s judgement on that and their decision that she was. These are really unique circumstances, it’s the first time we’ve had a case like this involving bullying allegations pitting one member against another.
“We have a job to support both and we had one member making very serious allegations and another maintaining their innocence of all bar one of them. “We were trying to find the words that walked that tightrope and we understand why it has caused the issues that it has and why we do want to make clear that we do accept the disciplinary panel’s finding that Bryony was bullied and the language used was deeply and grossly inappropriate. “We certainly accept we could have phrased it differently, I think there is that balance between the two polar opposite positions of the individuals involved in this case.” In October the PJA had called on the BHA to bring the case to a close, claiming a fair hearing would be “impossible” after details of the report were leaked to a newspaper. In Thursday’s statement the PJA said Dunne had been subjected to a process that was not “remotely fair”. Struthers now concedes the initial insistence the case be dropped could have been a mistake, but believes the process itself needs further scrutiny. He said: “Maybe it was an error and it would certainly have made life easier had we not made that call. I think there are things about the process, in particular in this case, but I think it is an issue we have had for some time about the process that licensed individuals face and concerns about the process.


Follow us on Twitter racing365dotcom and like our Facebook page.
Latest
-
Horse Racing
Durban July preview – Everything you need to know about Africa’s richest race
The Durban July is set to illuminate...
-
Horse Racing
5 things you need to know about the Irish Derby at Curragh Racecourse
The pinnacle of Ireland’s Flat racing season...
-
Horse Racing
Fashion, pageantry and elite turf battles – Everything you need to know ahead of Royal Ascot
Royal Ascot gets underway on Tuesday, 16...
-
Horse Racing
Chapeaux and Champions – A punter’s guide to the 2026 Prix de Diane Longines
The Prix de Diane Longines, affectionately dubbed...
-
Horse Racing
Belmont Stakes : Third leg of America’s Triple Crown set for final running at Saratoga Springs
The Belmont Stakes lines up for its...
-
Horse Racing
Epsom Derby 2026 – Aidan O’Brien sets his usual Classic conundrum
Aidan O’Brien’s tally of 11 previous victories...
-
Horse Racing
Introducing the Japanese Derby – everything you need to know about the Tokyo Yushun
The weekend of 31 May marks the...
-
Horse Racing
All you need to know about Tattersalls Irish 2,000 Guineas
The Tattersalls Irish 2,000 Guineas takes centre...
-
Horse Racing
The Laurel Park leap – 5 betting angles for a wide-open Preakness Stakes
The 151st Preakness Stakes arrives on Saturday,...









